Building Smarter: Leveraging Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Virtual Design and Construction (VDC) for Data Center Success

---

Data Center BIM & VDC Coordination: Why It Matters

Recently, the surge in data center construction has highlighted the need for strategic project management. Consequently, integrating BIM (Building Information Modeling) and VDC (Virtual Design and Construction) during preconstruction and construction is no longer optional. It is essential. Short timelines and the pressure to get facilities online often lead to errors and costly delays. Therefore, BIM and VDC coordination help teams evaluate constructability before installation, reducing rework and disruptions.

What Are BIM and VDC?

Over the past few decades, the AEC industry has shifted from 2D drawings to 3D modeling tools like Revit. As a result, teams can now visualize projects more comprehensively. Additionally, owners also benefit because they can interact with the design and ask questions before construction begins. Moreover, BIM goes beyond visualization. It associates real-world attributes with digital elements. For example, a simple line in 2D becomes a 12” HDPE storm drain pipe in BIM, complete with slope and elevation details. Design firms use BIM for documentation and proof of design intent, whereas VDC evaluates that intent in a construction setting.

How VDC Works

VDC begins by creating a federated model; a single file combining all trade models. Typically, these models are converted into Navisworks format for coordination. This matters because construction trade models include details like steel plates and bolts, which help teams assess constructability early.

Benefits of BIM and VDC Coordination

Using the federated model, VDC managers run clash detection and virtual walkthroughs. As a result, conflicts and non-constructable conditions are identified before they reach the field. Thereby, saving time and cost by preventing rework.

The ultimate goal of VDC is to prepare field teams to confidently proceed in the construction installation process knowing that the design intent has been reviewed and validated by all construction trade partners.

Industry Trends: Level of Development (LOD)

Model development is a potentially polarizing topic in the BIM world. It has led to disagreements that cite effort, cost, and utilization as defendants for one side or the other. Specifically, a fundamental topic of the debate is LOD (Level of Development), which is the measurement state of an element in relation to reality. In other words, as the LOD increases, the element takes on more accurate realistic qualities. For example, ductwork development progresses from an approximated line (LOD 100) to a 3D rectangular element that includes accurate dimensions, insulation, and support hangers (LOD 350–400). With higher LODs, the emphasis on installation also increases.

The debate, then, centers on responsibility for varying LODs:

What LOD is required for design models, and at what point do higher LOD expectations become a costly time sink?

The complexity of Data Center systems and the amount of real estate each system requires merits more detailed visualization and coordination prior to construction. Ducts, pipes, and vast webs of conduits and cable trays necessitate a detailed understanding of how these components must be installed in relation to other systems. An error in one system has a ripple effect on the others with a potentially costly and destabilizing result. This is no less the case for underground utilities.

Case Studies

In 2025, RWB Consulting Engineers received opportunities to model underground pipe utilities for data centers to coordinate underground conditions and assist field installation. Across several projects, the BIM and VDC coordination effort prevented construction errors and delays by identifying an unconstructable condition. On one project, the VDC team meticulously coordinated a 700’ run of storm drain piping with eight telecom and medium voltage conduit ductbanks and several large vaults to accommodate slope requirements, conduit depth restrictions, and culvert termination elevations. Meanwhile, in another case, a deviation of installation from the coordinated BIM model resulted in a costly reinstallation and rework of a large portion of a sewer pipe main, delaying the installation of conduit ductbanks and vaults as a result.

Design vs. Trade Partner Models

Documentation and Design Intent

Design team BIM models provide benefit to the project and owner in a very specific manner: design documentation. The design team models are always associated with the sealed approved design drawings. This means documentation of the design is affected by changes in the model elements. This becomes important as the project progresses and changes and revisions occur due to findings during construction. Continuously updating the model with these revisions ensures that the final handover of construction documents and the associated models are representative of each other as closely as possible relative to construction.

Key Differences Between Design and Trade Partner Models

Here is the major difference between a design model and a trade partner model: design models can be used for further building development and revision (i.e., providing a starting point), whereas trade partner models contain only modeling and associated installation information. On the other hand, trade partner models will reflect model coordination of actual construction conditions in the building’s final state (also known as “as-builts”). The benefit of both, then, is the complement of building design and building construction for the owner to possess for record and/or future development.

Furthermore, design team BIM models provide a foundation for the construction team by demonstrating spatial execution of the design and an intentional attempt at general model coordination. A thoughtfully coordinated model becomes a great asset for the construction team as they try to develop a more comprehensive understanding of the design intent and the level of constructability. Additionally, construction trade partners also have the advantage of leveraging the design team’s usage of BIM to quickly identify and understand each element’s applicable information without the need to refer to drawings, which can become tedious.

Looking Forward

Ultimately, the integration of BIM and VDC in data center construction is no longer a luxury, it is a necessity for achieving efficiency, accuracy, and cost control in an industry driven by speed and complexity. By leveraging detailed models and collaborative coordination exercises, project teams can proactively identify and resolve constructability challenges before they impact the field. This approach not only minimizes rework and delays but also enhances transparency for owners and stakeholders, ensuring that design intent aligns with real-world conditions. As data centers continue to grow in scale and sophistication, the adoption of BIM and VDC practices will remain a cornerstone of successful project delivery, setting the standard for innovation and precision in the AEC industry.